In the fast-paced world of Indian business, Arbitration is the gold standard for dispute resolution—offering speed and flexibility that traditional courts often can’t match.
While the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 aims for total finality, Section 34 acts as a critical “safety valve.” It ensures that while the arbitrator’s word is usually final, the doors of justice remain open to cancel (set aside) any award tainted by serious procedural flaws or legal blunders.
1. Key Principles of Section 34
-
Minimal Interference: Courts cannot change the award or re-hear the case like an appeal. They only act as a supervisor to fix major errors.
-
Finality: Once an award is given, it is binding. Section 34 is an exception, not a routine step.
-
Domestic Only: Section 34 only applies to awards passed in India. For foreign awards, courts use Section 48 to refuse enforcement.
2. Strict Time Limits
Timing is everything in arbitration. You must be quick:
-
Standard Deadline: You must file the application within 3 months of receiving the award.
-
Grace Period: The court can allow an extra 30 days only if you have a very good reason for the delay.
-
No Exceptions: After 3 months + 30 days, the court cannot help you, no matter how strong your case is.
3. On What Grounds Can an Award Be Set Aside?
The law lists specific reasons for challenging an award. If your reason isn’t on this list, the court won’t listen.
A. Grounds You Must Prove (Section 34(2)(a))
-
Incapacity: A party was not legally capable of signing the agreement (e.g., a minor).
-
Invalid Agreement: The arbitration contract itself was illegal or invalid.
-
No Notice: You weren’t told about the arbitrator’s appointment or the hearings.
-
Beyond Scope: The arbitrator decided on topics that weren’t part of the agreement.
-
Wrong Procedure: The tribunal was formed incorrectly or didn’t follow the agreed-upon rules.
B. Grounds the Court Checks Automatically (Section 34(2)(b))
-
Non-Arbitrable: The dispute is of a nature that only a court can solve (e.g., criminal cases, divorce, or insolvency).
-
Public Policy: The award is against the “Public Policy of India.” This means it was:
-
Affected by fraud or corruption.
-
Against the fundamental policy of Indian law.
-
Against basic morality or justice.
-
C. Patent Illegality (Section 34(2A))
For purely Indian disputes (not international), an award can be set aside if there is a massive legal mistake “on the face of it.” However, you cannot use this just because the arbitrator interpreted the evidence differently than you wanted.
4. The “Waiver” Rule
If you knew something was wrong during the arbitration (like a procedural mistake) but didn’t complain then, you cannot complain about it later in court. By staying silent, you “waived” your right to object.
5. What Happens Next?
If the court sets aside the award:
-
The award becomes useless and cannot be enforced.
-
The parties go back to the start. They can start a fresh arbitration or go to a regular court.
-
The court’s decision can be appealed once more under Section 37.
